Post-Grant Patent Proceedings


Our attorneys have represented patent owner, TLIF, in defending against challenge to patent directed to intervertebral implants.  Case settled on confidential terms and IPR proceeding terminated on motion by parties.

Biomet Spine, LLC v. TLIF, LLC, IPR2015-00738


Our attorneys have represented petitioner, Tooltechnic Systems LLC, in challenging three patents directed to power tools and Li-ion power supplies.  Cases are currently on appeal to the Federal Circuit.

Chervon North America, Inc. v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp, IPR2015-00597, IPR2015-00596, IPR2015-00595


Our attorneys have represented patent owner, Vantage Point Technology, in defending against challenges to two patents related to computing systems employing virtual addressing of data.  Cases settled on confidential terms and the IPR proceedings were terminated on motion by parties.

Apple Inc. v. Vantage Point Technology, Inc., IPR2015-00192, IPR2015-00191


Our attorneys have represented patent owner, Orthophoenix, in defending against challenges to two patents directed to systems and methods for treating bone, such as cancellous bone.  Petitions denied after patent owner’s preliminary responses.

Wright Medical Technology, Inc. v. Orthophoenix, IPR2014-00912, IPR2014-00908


Our attorneys have represented patent owner, Sarif Biomedical, in defending against challenge to patent directed to apparatus and method for making preoperative images of a patient, such as those obtained by an MRI or CT scan, available in real time during surgery.  Case settled on confidential terms and IPR proceeding terminated on motion by parties.

Brainlab AG v. Sarif Biomedical LLC,  IPR2014-00753


Our attorneys have represented patent owner, George Peschke, in defending against challenge to patent directed to a map navigation system employing clickable layouts.  Case settled on confidential terms and IPR proceeding terminated on motion by parties.

General Growth Properties, Inc. v. Peschke, George, IPR2013-00400